ashutosa
08-01 12:12 AM
Dear Sir/Madam,
I would really appreciate if you can help on the question below.
1) My wife changed her last name after our wedding.
2) She got it updated on new passport, I-20 and SSN.
Now, we are planning to travel to India. She has her old as well as new passport .. and the F1 visa and I-94 is still at the old passport.
My question is: Does she need to get her F1 stamped again in order to get the updated name on her new passport?
I would greatly appreciate your fast response.
Thanks,
-Ashu
I would really appreciate if you can help on the question below.
1) My wife changed her last name after our wedding.
2) She got it updated on new passport, I-20 and SSN.
Now, we are planning to travel to India. She has her old as well as new passport .. and the F1 visa and I-94 is still at the old passport.
My question is: Does she need to get her F1 stamped again in order to get the updated name on her new passport?
I would greatly appreciate your fast response.
Thanks,
-Ashu
wallpaper medium hair styles
needhelp!
01-23 01:34 PM
When: Saturday, 24th Jan during Thawer Law RADIO show at 3 pm Central
Where: 700 AM if you are in dfw area or listen online @ funasia.net
Where: 700 AM if you are in dfw area or listen online @ funasia.net
rs1518
07-18 10:09 AM
My company and lawyer refuse to talk to me or email me back.
I sent my completed package to the lawyer 2 weeks back, and I have not heard back from him.
The initial draft needs to be sent back by the lawyer for signatures and then the file can go out.
How do I hadle the situation?
I sent my completed package to the lawyer 2 weeks back, and I have not heard back from him.
The initial draft needs to be sent back by the lawyer for signatures and then the file can go out.
How do I hadle the situation?
2011 medium length emo hair
testtesttest
07-17 05:56 PM
http://murthy.com/uscis_update.pdf
more...
Blog Feeds
05-28 02:20 AM
All too often, it seems that some examiners at USCIS Service Centers are just looking for a way to deny petitions. Long-standing policies are ignored and new theories are advanced to deny perfectly-qualified applicants for immigration benefits. A few months ago, a few examiners decided on their own that M.B.B.S. degrees which are issued to physicians from British Commonwealth countries were not equivalent to M.D. degrees issued by medical schools in the U.S. As a result, many petitions and applications were denied on this basis. After much protest from the medical community, the USCIS in Washington got involved, and the...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/05/h-1bs-for-health-care-workers-advanced-degree-not-required.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/05/h-1bs-for-health-care-workers-advanced-degree-not-required.html)
gcpower1
01-28 02:28 PM
140 Approved + 485 Pending.................
Do what ever you want untill you get RFE for EVL.
Do what ever you want untill you get RFE for EVL.
more...
kashyapjv
07-19 03:06 AM
During the month of June, when the dates were announced in July Bulletin, that all the EB are CURRENT, we were prepared to apply. But my wife has some health issues and after the July2nd news, she left to India for Treatment. As per doctors now she can't travel till end of August. My questions are:
1) If I apply for my I-485, at what stage in I-485 can i add my wife as a dependant so she also gets her EAD and AP along with me?
2) Somewhere on the internet, I have seen that I can apply for my spouse's Green card 180 days after my Green card approval also as long as we were married before my I-485 was applied. Is this true? Can someone please confirm?
3) Curretnly my wife is on H-1B and she still has 5more years on it. Can I apply for her I-485 once the dates open up again?
Please advice as what are the best options?
1) If I apply for my I-485, at what stage in I-485 can i add my wife as a dependant so she also gets her EAD and AP along with me?
2) Somewhere on the internet, I have seen that I can apply for my spouse's Green card 180 days after my Green card approval also as long as we were married before my I-485 was applied. Is this true? Can someone please confirm?
3) Curretnly my wife is on H-1B and she still has 5more years on it. Can I apply for her I-485 once the dates open up again?
Please advice as what are the best options?
2010 Medium Length Scene Girls
vinzak
01-15 04:11 PM
There shouldn't be a problem. There's your DOB, A# and photograph on the card to verify that the person is actually you.
But I think you should still file for a correction.
But I think you should still file for a correction.
more...
Blog Feeds
07-27 03:40 PM
H-1B visas are a relatively swift path to employment for foreigners with bachelor's degrees and U.S. employers to sponsor them. Each year, the U.S. government makes 65,000 H-1B visas available to qualified individuals on a first-come basis. The cap has been reached every year for the last several years, and for fiscal year 2008, it was reached on the first day of filing. As of July 10, 2009, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) had received 44,900 H-1B cap-subject petitions that have been counted towards the 65,000 H-1B cap. USCIS continues to accept cap-subject petitions.
If you would like more information regarding the H-1B visa cap, please call Kraft & Associates at 214-999-9999.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/MRjUMasCbZw/)
If you would like more information regarding the H-1B visa cap, please call Kraft & Associates at 214-999-9999.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/MRjUMasCbZw/)
hair Layered medium length haircuts
desinj
07-19 10:21 PM
I'm trying to beat the July deadline.
Pls. help if you know from where to get the list - for NJ or NY.
thanks
Pls. help if you know from where to get the list - for NJ or NY.
thanks
more...
Blog Feeds
06-09 11:50 PM
Congrats to the Pittsburgh Penguins on competing in the 2009 Stanley Cup! The team, like all teams in the National Hockey League, is chock full of immigrant players. They include the following: Craig Adams - Right Wing - Canada (born in Brunei) Philippe Boucher - Canada Matt Cooke - Canada Sidney Crosby - Canada Pascal Dupuis - Canada Ruslan Fedotenko - Ukraine Marc-Andre Fleury - Canada Mathieu Garon - Canada Eric Godard - Canada Sergei Gonchar - Russia Dustin Jeffrey - Canada Tyler Kennedy - Canada Chris Kunitz - Canada Kristopher Letang - Canada Evgeni Malkin - Russia...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/immigrants-of-the-day-immigrants-on-the-pittsburgh-penguins.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/06/immigrants-of-the-day-immigrants-on-the-pittsburgh-penguins.html)
hot hairstyles for long hair girls
littleicy
04-19 12:06 PM
For form I-130
Date authorized stay expired, or will expire, as shown on Form I-94 or I-95?
There is no expiry date in his I-94. What should I write? Is it like D/S (F1)?
Name and address of present employer (if any) for my husband.
Should I write Graduate Student or leave it blank?
Your relative is in the United States and will apply for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident at the USCIS office in:
Can I write San Diego? I found it only needs 4 months to complete it. We are in Los Angeles now.
Thank you in advance.
Date authorized stay expired, or will expire, as shown on Form I-94 or I-95?
There is no expiry date in his I-94. What should I write? Is it like D/S (F1)?
Name and address of present employer (if any) for my husband.
Should I write Graduate Student or leave it blank?
Your relative is in the United States and will apply for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident at the USCIS office in:
Can I write San Diego? I found it only needs 4 months to complete it. We are in Los Angeles now.
Thank you in advance.
more...
house Medium length hairstyles
Aah_GC
07-19 10:50 PM
I found Sophy Thomas to be an excellent client advocate...
Sophy Thomas, Immigration Attorney: A collection of Immigration Resources that cover Immigrationm law and immigration processes assembled by an immigration lawyer / Attorney (http://www.immigrationattorneys.com/)
She is very good..
Sophy Thomas, Immigration Attorney: A collection of Immigration Resources that cover Immigrationm law and immigration processes assembled by an immigration lawyer / Attorney (http://www.immigrationattorneys.com/)
She is very good..
tattoo medium length hair styles
sen
11-29 08:58 AM
I recently joined a company in New York area and my family resides in Chicago. Eventhough my permanent address is in Chicago, i temporarily stay in NY area. Do I need to file AR-11?
Regards
Sen
Regards
Sen
more...
pictures Party hairstyles for short
Macaca
09-27 11:40 AM
Following Bush Over a Cliff (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/26/AR2007092602067.html) By David S. Broder (davidbroder@washpost.com) | Washington Post, September 27, 2007
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
The spectacle Tuesday of 151 House Republicans voting in lock step with the White House against expansion of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was one of the more remarkable sights of the year. Rarely do you see so many politicians putting their careers in jeopardy.
The bill they opposed, at the urging of President Bush, commands healthy majorities in both the House and Senate but is headed for a veto because Bush objects to expanding this form of safety net for the children of the working poor. He has staked out that ground on his own, ignoring or rejecting the pleas of conservative senators such as Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch, who helped shape the compromise that the House approved and that the Senate endorsed.
SCHIP has been one of the most successful health-care measures created in the past decade. It was started in 1997 with support from both parties, in order to insure children in families with incomes too high to receive Medicaid but who could not afford private insurance.
The $40 billion spent on SCHIP in the past 10 years financed insurance for roughly 6.6 million youngsters a year. The money was distributed through the states, which were given considerable flexibility in designing their programs. The insurance came from private companies, at rates negotiated by the states.
Governors of both parties -- 43 of them, again including conservatives such as Sonny Perdue of Georgia -- have praised the program. And they endorsed the congressional decision to expand the coverage to an additional 4 million youngsters, at the cost of an additional $35 billion over the next five years. The bill would be financed by a 61-cents-a-pack increase in cigarette taxes. If ever there was a crowd-pleaser of a bill, this is it. Hundreds of organizations -- grass-roots groups ranging from AARP to United Way of America and the national YMCA -- have called on Bush to sign the bill. America's Health Insurance Plans, the largest insurance lobbying group, endorsed the bill on Monday.
But Bush insists that SCHIP is "an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American" -- an eventuality he is determined to prevent.
Bush's adamant stand may be peculiar to him, but the willingness of Republican legislators to line up with him is more significant. Bush does not have to face the voters again, but these men and women will be on the ballot in just over a year -- and their Democratic opponents will undoubtedly remind them of their votes.
Two of their smartest colleagues -- Heather Wilson of New Mexico and Ray LaHood of Illinois -- tried to steer House Republicans away from this political self-immolation, but they had minimal success. The combined influence of White House and congressional leadership -- and what I would have to call herd instinct -- prevailed.
Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) argued that "rather than taking the opportunity to cover the children that cannot obtain coverage through Medicaid or the private marketplace, this bill uses these children as pawns in their cynical attempt to make millions of Americans completely reliant upon the government for their health-care needs."
In his new book, former Federal Reserve Board chairman Alan Greenspan wrote that his fellow Republicans deserved to lose their congressional majority in 2006 because they let spending run out of control and turned a blind eye toward misbehavior by their own members. Now, those Republicans have given voters a fresh reason to question their priorities -- or their common sense.
Saying no to immigration reform and measures to shorten the war in Iraq may be politically defensible, because there are substantial constituencies who question the wisdom of those bills -- and who favor alternative policies. But the Bush administration's arguments against SCHIP -- the cost of the program and the financing -- sound hollow at a time when billions more are being spent in Iraq with no end in sight. Bush's alternative -- a change in the tax treatment of employer-financed health insurance -- has some real appeal, but it is an idea he let languish for months after offering it last winter. And, in the judgment of his fellow Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, Bush's plan is too complex and controversial to be tied to the renewal of SCHIP.
This promised veto is a real poison pill for the GOP.
dresses medium length hairstyles
reddy_h
09-08 10:50 AM
Relax! Wait for couple of days. Sometimes it takes time to get updated. If you don't see anything in couple of days, call USCIS customer service.
more...
makeup medium length hair styles for
Jason31586
07-08 12:01 PM
is it possible to do animations with people and stick figures like done in flash 5,
is there away to get lines to draw in swift 3d instead of stuff like spheres and cubes, please answer
is there away to get lines to draw in swift 3d instead of stuff like spheres and cubes, please answer
girlfriend Medium length hairstyles are
laddu0
04-06 09:35 AM
Hi Guys:
My wife is out of country from October 2010. She was working on H1B. After birth of our son, she went to India for 6 month vacation. Will there be any issues if she re-enters US using H1B as she is having a job to continue with her employer.
What are all the documents I need to take.
Please advice.
Thanks
LADDU
My wife is out of country from October 2010. She was working on H1B. After birth of our son, she went to India for 6 month vacation. Will there be any issues if she re-enters US using H1B as she is having a job to continue with her employer.
What are all the documents I need to take.
Please advice.
Thanks
LADDU
hairstyles medium-length hair down.
malibuguy007
09-11 05:14 PM
Anyone?
agc2005
10-16 07:37 AM
aguy:
To Invoke AC21(to work on EAD) Your I140 must be approved and you need to pass 180 days after your RecieptDate.
To Invoke AC21(to work on EAD) Your I140 must be approved and you need to pass 180 days after your RecieptDate.
hetalvn
09-19 05:07 PM
hi
we are paying social security and medicare taxes where as we are not entitle to any of this benefits. they are taking this taxes based on giving permanent status but they have slowed green card processing near to impossible. that's fine, but taking social security taxes is not right when we are certainly not going to part of that system.
they must stop those taxes till green card is processed.
we are paying social security and medicare taxes where as we are not entitle to any of this benefits. they are taking this taxes based on giving permanent status but they have slowed green card processing near to impossible. that's fine, but taking social security taxes is not right when we are certainly not going to part of that system.
they must stop those taxes till green card is processed.
No comments:
Post a Comment